<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for freebiescom.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freebiescom.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freebiescom.org</link>
	<description>freebies com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Mars by K. Spyker</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars/comment-page-1#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Spyker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Pros:   Robinson creates vivid images of life on Mars. For the most part, the technical aspects added an incredible amount of realism to the story. Which makes for the best kind of science fiction. I especially enjoyed the chapters that made the space elevator come alive in the imagination as we may never get to see it elsewhere.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Cons: His explorations into the sociology,sexuality, and psychology of his characters were often boring,always lengthy,and sometimes unexpectedly and disturbingly crass. (i.e. not for the kids to read)If that weren&#039;t bad enough,he also attacks Christianity of all types with a sledge hammer. Declaring it repeatedly as an archaic religion for a band of greedy idiots. All other types of faith are regarded as &quot;interesting&quot; and &quot;progressive&quot;. Robinson could have introduced his ideas into the story without being so heavy handed and long winded. Unfortunately he did not.
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pros:   Robinson creates vivid images of life on Mars. For the most part, the technical aspects added an incredible amount of realism to the story. Which makes for the best kind of science fiction. I especially enjoyed the chapters that made the space elevator come alive in the imagination as we may never get to see it elsewhere.</p>
<p>Cons: His explorations into the sociology,sexuality, and psychology of his characters were often boring,always lengthy,and sometimes unexpectedly and disturbingly crass. (i.e. not for the kids to read)If that weren&#8217;t bad enough,he also attacks Christianity of all types with a sledge hammer. Declaring it repeatedly as an archaic religion for a band of greedy idiots. All other types of faith are regarded as &#8220;interesting&#8221; and &#8220;progressive&#8221;. Robinson could have introduced his ideas into the story without being so heavy handed and long winded. Unfortunately he did not.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Mars by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars/comment-page-1#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars#comment-774</guid>
		<description>I would give this book no stars if possible (even negative stars would be better.) You don&#039;t have to read more than 20 pages of this junk to identify Red Moon as &quot;it&#039;s-another-politically-correct-piece-of-garbage-agitprop-kind-of-book&quot; that infests the retail bookshelves with what passes for &quot;literature&quot; these days.&lt;p&gt;The author clearly hates whites and arabs, and it would be interesting to know the ethnicity of the author.  I think we can guess.&lt;p&gt;Best to spend your hard-earned money on the Classics until the new Dark Age is over.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would give this book no stars if possible (even negative stars would be better.) You don&#8217;t have to read more than 20 pages of this junk to identify Red Moon as &#8220;it&#8217;s-another-politically-correct-piece-of-garbage-agitprop-kind-of-book&#8221; that infests the retail bookshelves with what passes for &#8220;literature&#8221; these days.
<p>The author clearly hates whites and arabs, and it would be interesting to know the ethnicity of the author.  I think we can guess.</p>
<p>Best to spend your hard-earned money on the Classics until the new Dark Age is over.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Mars by David Rapavi</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars/comment-page-1#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rapavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Robinson&#039;s &quot;Red Mars&quot; follows the stories of 100 men and women as they train for, travel to, and inhabit Mars. Each chapter in the novel is told from the distinct point of view of one of several major characters.  Oddly, Robinson&#039;s technique fails to reveal anything really interesting about any of these people.  When American space hero, John Boone, is murdered in the first chapter, I expected to eventually find out why.  Is that alot to hope for?  Other events ensue, Mars changes, more major characters die... to me, at least, these characters never seemed all that alive in the first place...
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;While &quot;Red Mars&quot; is certainly vast in scope and largely interesting from a scientific standpoint, the overall story suffers from underdeveloped characters, an overemphasis on Martian landscape, and no cohesive plot.  And maybe that&#039;s Robinson&#039;s plan - the major character in the novel is Mars itself, not the folks who live there...
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robinson&#8217;s &#8220;Red Mars&#8221; follows the stories of 100 men and women as they train for, travel to, and inhabit Mars. Each chapter in the novel is told from the distinct point of view of one of several major characters.  Oddly, Robinson&#8217;s technique fails to reveal anything really interesting about any of these people.  When American space hero, John Boone, is murdered in the first chapter, I expected to eventually find out why.  Is that alot to hope for?  Other events ensue, Mars changes, more major characters die&#8230; to me, at least, these characters never seemed all that alive in the first place&#8230;</p>
<p>While &#8220;Red Mars&#8221; is certainly vast in scope and largely interesting from a scientific standpoint, the overall story suffers from underdeveloped characters, an overemphasis on Martian landscape, and no cohesive plot.  And maybe that&#8217;s Robinson&#8217;s plan &#8211; the major character in the novel is Mars itself, not the folks who live there&#8230;<br />
<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Mars by Stewart Teaze</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars/comment-page-1#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Teaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 06:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars#comment-772</guid>
		<description>RED MARS(1993) contains a decent and plausible story about the first colonists sent to Mars in the year 2027.  One of the most believable aspects of the story is the use of Antartica for a training/practice base, prior to the actual mission.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Yet, with 2006 hindsight, there are a number of critical situations which don&#039;t hold up well 13+ years later... here are a few:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;1) The year 2027 is overly optimistic for colonization of Mars - mankind will be lucky to have even set foot on Mars by this date, let alone attempt a hugely expensive colonization effort.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;2) The MARS colony spacecraft is made up of 48 boosted Shuttle upper stages... this is never going to happen - indeed, at this point it is clear that the Space Shuttle won&#039;t fly more than a handful more missions... and, certainly, Shuttle upper stages aren&#039;t going to be boosted and used for any reason (this upper stage boosting idea seems to have been a pipe dream fantasy of some in the early 90&#039;s, and Robinson seems to have fallen in with this group). 
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;3) The original 100 member Colony team is made up of almost a 50/50 mix of Americans vs. Russians... realistically, this colonization will likely be made sometime after 2050 by independent Chinese, American, or Indian efforts (with lesser powers Russia, Europe, and likely Japan &quot;helping&quot; one or the other of these future superpowers).
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;4) Later colonization participants include a large faction from the Muslim world... again, this is highly unlikely given the current political climate, and a more &quot;enlightened view&quot; of the Muslim world.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;This book is part of a Mars Colonization &quot;trilogy&quot;, and the last two books, GREEN MARS(1995) and BLUE MARS(1997) won Hugo awards.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RED MARS(1993) contains a decent and plausible story about the first colonists sent to Mars in the year 2027.  One of the most believable aspects of the story is the use of Antartica for a training/practice base, prior to the actual mission.</p>
<p>Yet, with 2006 hindsight, there are a number of critical situations which don&#8217;t hold up well 13+ years later&#8230; here are a few:</p>
<p>1) The year 2027 is overly optimistic for colonization of Mars &#8211; mankind will be lucky to have even set foot on Mars by this date, let alone attempt a hugely expensive colonization effort.</p>
<p>2) The MARS colony spacecraft is made up of 48 boosted Shuttle upper stages&#8230; this is never going to happen &#8211; indeed, at this point it is clear that the Space Shuttle won&#8217;t fly more than a handful more missions&#8230; and, certainly, Shuttle upper stages aren&#8217;t going to be boosted and used for any reason (this upper stage boosting idea seems to have been a pipe dream fantasy of some in the early 90&#8217;s, and Robinson seems to have fallen in with this group). </p>
<p>3) The original 100 member Colony team is made up of almost a 50/50 mix of Americans vs. Russians&#8230; realistically, this colonization will likely be made sometime after 2050 by independent Chinese, American, or Indian efforts (with lesser powers Russia, Europe, and likely Japan &#8220;helping&#8221; one or the other of these future superpowers).</p>
<p>4) Later colonization participants include a large faction from the Muslim world&#8230; again, this is highly unlikely given the current political climate, and a more &#8220;enlightened view&#8221; of the Muslim world.</p>
<p>This book is part of a Mars Colonization &#8220;trilogy&#8221;, and the last two books, GREEN MARS(1995) and BLUE MARS(1997) won Hugo awards.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Mars by S.H.</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars/comment-page-1#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>S.H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 04:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/red-mars#comment-771</guid>
		<description>well... I read 150 pages.  I would normally keep reading on, but... it wasnt good... or bad.  And since I have like 30 unread books on my shelf, I decided to skip it.  I was just not into it.... here is why.
&lt;br /&gt;It is SF... barely.  It is about a guy, that is very very ambitious.... who plays of stereotypes of different cultures to better himself... on Mars.
&lt;br /&gt;The author loves to throw in random science sounding stuff... that has no bearing on anything plot wise.  Was like, he had this idea about an ambitious guy, but wanted to write in based on mars, so he just added SF stuff to spice it up.  I want more SF oriented stuff... but.... I didnt get it.
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230; I read 150 pages.  I would normally keep reading on, but&#8230; it wasnt good&#8230; or bad.  And since I have like 30 unread books on my shelf, I decided to skip it.  I was just not into it&#8230;. here is why.<br />
<br />It is SF&#8230; barely.  It is about a guy, that is very very ambitious&#8230;. who plays of stereotypes of different cultures to better himself&#8230; on Mars.<br />
<br />The author loves to throw in random science sounding stuff&#8230; that has no bearing on anything plot wise.  Was like, he had this idea about an ambitious guy, but wanted to write in based on mars, so he just added SF stuff to spice it up.  I want more SF oriented stuff&#8230; but&#8230;. I didnt get it.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paranoia by Parag Bhatnagar</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia/comment-page-1#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Parag Bhatnagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t read typically fiction, but this was a page-turner. Cancelled lectures, appointments and skipped work to finish this novel.
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t read typically fiction, but this was a page-turner. Cancelled lectures, appointments and skipped work to finish this novel.<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paranoia by T. M. Sklarski</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia/comment-page-1#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>T. M. Sklarski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia#comment-751</guid>
		<description>This is a so so book if you&#039;re over 60 like myself.&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d recommend it for Yuppies.
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a so so book if you&#8217;re over 60 like myself.<br />I&#8217;d recommend it for Yuppies.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paranoia by Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia/comment-page-1#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia#comment-750</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s time out of my life I won&#039;t get back.  I really do have to change my thought process of thinking I have to finish every book I start.  What a waste of time.  What a silly book.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s time out of my life I won&#8217;t get back.  I really do have to change my thought process of thinking I have to finish every book I start.  What a waste of time.  What a silly book.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paranoia by David W. Stratton</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia/comment-page-1#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>David W. Stratton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone buy a Kindle book from Amazon when Amazon has made it VERY clear from their recent &#039;1984&#039; and &#039;Animal Farm&#039; debacle that they reserve the right to completely delete your purchase at any time? Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but the point of buying something is to make it YOURS, so that you can do with it whatever you please, not to borrow it for a brief period of time until the person who loaned it to you feels like arbitrarily taking it back. What a terrible idea! Down with Kindle, and down with Amazon!
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;It is my hope that by posting these comments, Amazon will come under pressure to reveal its Digital Restriction Management policy, as well as how its DRM software works. Furthermore, I hope they will discontinue their policy of remotely deleting and/or crippling books that have been purchased. This is America, Amazon. We don&#039;t believe in Memory Holes!
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone buy a Kindle book from Amazon when Amazon has made it VERY clear from their recent &#8216;1984&#8242; and &#8216;Animal Farm&#8217; debacle that they reserve the right to completely delete your purchase at any time? Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but the point of buying something is to make it YOURS, so that you can do with it whatever you please, not to borrow it for a brief period of time until the person who loaned it to you feels like arbitrarily taking it back. What a terrible idea! Down with Kindle, and down with Amazon!</p>
<p>It is my hope that by posting these comments, Amazon will come under pressure to reveal its Digital Restriction Management policy, as well as how its DRM software works. Furthermore, I hope they will discontinue their policy of remotely deleting and/or crippling books that have been purchased. This is America, Amazon. We don&#8217;t believe in Memory Holes!<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paranoia by Hedley Finger</title>
		<link>http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia/comment-page-1#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Hedley Finger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freebiescom.org/paranoia#comment-748</guid>
		<description>This is a product defective by design.  Are you aware that Amazon can interfere with books you thought you had purchased and owned?  Ironically, hundreds of purchasers of George Orwell&#039;s &quot;1984&quot; and &quot;Animal Farm&quot; had these titles, which they owned, deleted from their Kindles by Amazon.
&lt;br /&gt;Others had the &quot;Read Aloud&quot; function switched off for titles that they had purchased.  A student who had annotated a book lost all his work when the title was deleted.  Unlike a real book, a Kindle book has a long piece of wire all the way back to Amazon, so they can jerk you around however they want.
&lt;br /&gt;And it&#039;s overpriced.  They are using the cheap razor, expensive blades paradigm, except the Kindle ain&#039;t cheap.
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a product defective by design.  Are you aware that Amazon can interfere with books you thought you had purchased and owned?  Ironically, hundreds of purchasers of George Orwell&#8217;s &#8220;1984&#8243; and &#8220;Animal Farm&#8221; had these titles, which they owned, deleted from their Kindles by Amazon.<br />
<br />Others had the &#8220;Read Aloud&#8221; function switched off for titles that they had purchased.  A student who had annotated a book lost all his work when the title was deleted.  Unlike a real book, a Kindle book has a long piece of wire all the way back to Amazon, so they can jerk you around however they want.<br />
<br />And it&#8217;s overpriced.  They are using the cheap razor, expensive blades paradigm, except the Kindle ain&#8217;t cheap.<br />
<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
